<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Davies, J. Clarence</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nanolessons for revamping government oversight of technology </style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Issues in Science and Technology </style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.issues.org/26.1/davies.html</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English </style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this article, the author looks at the challenges nanotechnology poses for U.S. federal agencies responsible for environmental health and safety regulation. He argues that the powers of these agencies have steadily eroded over the past few years and that to properly regulate nanotechnology, the government should start from scratch and create a new agency that would be a science agency with a strong regulatory component. He outlines the framework of the proposed agency and its potential activities in the regulation of new technologies.  </style></abstract></record></records></xml>