<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nowack, Bernd</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Krug, Harald F</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Height, Murray</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">120 Years of Nanosilver History: Implications for Policy Makers.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Environmental science &amp; technology</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011 Jan 10</style></date></pub-dates></dates><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nanosilver is one nanomaterial that is currently under a lot of scrutiny. Much of the discussion is based on the assumption that nanosilver is something new that has not been seen until recently and that the advances in nanotechnology opened completely new application areas for silver. However, we show in this analysis that nanosilver in the form of colloidal silver has been used for more than 100 years and has been registered as a biocidal material in the United States since 1954.  The implications of this analysis for policy of nanosilver is that it would be a mistake for regulators to ignore the accumulated knowledge of our scientific and regulatory heritage in a bid to declare nanosilver materials as new chemicals, with unknown properties and automatically harmful simply on the basis of a change in nomenclature to the term &quot;nano&quot;.</style></abstract><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21218770?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record></records></xml>