<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nordmann, Alfred</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Macnaghten, Phil</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Engaging Narratives and the Limits of Lay Ethics: Introduction</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NanoEthics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1007/s11569-010-0095-6</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Springer Netherlands</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">133 - 140</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How can one discover the ethical issues associated with nanotechnologies? One heuristic is to tend closely to the ethical reflections of lay publics and the ways in which these are informed by experience with technological innovation, technology governance, and the (broken) promises of visionary science and technology. A close collaboration between social scientists and philosophers took this heuristic to its limits: On the one hand, it achieved remarkably fine–grained insights into public reflection about nanotechnologies. On the other hand, a philosophical analysis of these reflections makes apparent that there is a profound disconnect between the lay ethics rooted in public talk and the ethical and normative commitments that are embedded in nanotechnological research programs and practices. This paper describes the aims of the DEEPEN project - namely to explore the motivations behind engaging stakeholders and lay publics and how these conversations helped to express the lay publics understanding of nanoethics, as well as what is actually meant by the &quot;responsible development of nanotechnology.&quot;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue></record></records></xml>