<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kuzma, Jennifer</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Najmaie, Pouya</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Larson, Joel</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evaluating Oversight Systems for Emerging Technologies: A Case Study of Genetically Engineered Organisms</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Law, Medicine &amp; Ethics</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AGRICULTURAL technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BIOTECHNOLOGY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GENETIC engineering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GOVERNMENT policy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LEGISLATIVE oversight</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NANOTECHNOLOGY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RESEARCH</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UNITED States</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Winter2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">37</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">546-586</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article evaluates the U.S. oversight system for genetically engineered organisms to develop hypotheses and derive lessons for oversight of other emerging technologies, such as nanotechnology. The authors' analysis suggests several lessons for oversight of emerging technologies: the importance of reducing complexity and uncertainty in oversight for minimizing financial burdens on small product developers; consolidating multi-agency jurisdictions to avoid gaps and redundancies in safety reviews; consumer benefits for advancing acceptance of GEO products; rigorous and independent pre- and post-market assessment for environmental safety; early public input and transparency for ensuring public confidence; and the positive role of public input in system development, informed consent, capacity, compliance, incentives, and data requirements and stringency in promoting health and environmental safety outcomes, as well as the equitable distribution of health impacts.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">46823903</style></accession-num><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kuzma, Jennifer 1 Najmaie, Pouya 2 Larson, Joel 3; Affiliation: 1: Associate Professor and Area Chair of the Science, Technology, and Environmental Policy Program at the Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota. 2: M.S. candidate in Science, Technology, and Environmental Policy at the Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota. 3: Graduate of the MPP program in Science, Technology, and Environmental Policy at the Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota and Presidential Management Fellow.; Source Info: Winter2009, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p546; Subject Term: NANOTECHNOLOGY; Subject Term: GENETIC engineering; Subject Term: RESEARCH; Subject Term: LEGISLATIVE oversight; Subject Term: AGRICULTURAL technology; Subject Term: BIOTECHNOLOGY; Subject Term: GOVERNMENT policy; Subject Term: UNITED States; Number of Pages: 41p; Illustrations: 4 Diagrams, 4 Charts, 3 Graphs; Document Type: Article</style></notes></record></records></xml>