<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Corley, Elizabeth A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scheufele, Dietram A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hu, Qian</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Nanoparticle Research</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">J Nanopart Res</style></short-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1573 - 1585</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This study explores the heuristics that the leading U.S. nanoscientists use when they make policy decisions about regulating nanomaterials by looking at the relationship between nanoscientists' risk and benefit perceptions and their support for nanotechnology regulation. The authors conclude that nanoscientists are more supportive of regulation when they perceive higher levels of risk, but their perception of the perceived benefits of a nanotechnology application does not significantly impact their support for nanotechnology regulation. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></issue></record></records></xml>